Skip to content

Booking August builds

A Head of Content. Without the hire.

I own your content growth system end to end – strategy, the two or three channels that actually work for you, production, conversion, and the numbers that prove it. My team and AI infrastructure carry the volume.

See how it works
The bottleneck

You don't have a content problem. You have an ownership problem.

There's a blog. Maybe a writer. Maybe a LinkedIn account nobody posts on. What there isn't is one person accountable for whether any of it produces demand.

Nobody actually owns content.

It is split across a founder who posts when they remember, a writer with a list of keywords, and a freelancer nobody briefed. Everyone has a task. No one has the outcome.

The content is disconnected from your customers.

Nothing in the pipeline came out of a sales call, a support ticket, or a customer interview. So it reads like everyone else in your category, because it was researched the same way.

You publish. You do not distribute.

The article goes live and that is the end of it. No post, no newsletter, no answer in the place your buyers are already asking. One asset doing the work of one asset.

You hired a writer, not a system.

Great at producing words. Not responsible for which channel to bet on, what the conversion path looks like, or whether any of it moves a number you care about.

An agency owns their channel, not your outcome.

The SEO agency sells SEO. The social agency sells social. Each one is measured on the thing they sell, and the gaps between them belong to you.

Nobody can tell you what any of it is doing.

Published counts and traffic charts, but no line from content to a signup, a demo, or an account that engaged. So budget flows to whatever is easiest to report.

The system

One system. Five layers. One owner.

A content growth system is not a pile of deliverables. It's five layers that feed each other, and the reason most of them underperform is that nobody owns all five at once.

  1. 01

    Strategy

    What we say, to whom, and why it lands

  2. 02

    Content engine

    Turning expertise into reusable assets

  3. 03

    Distribution

    The two or three channels we pick

  4. 04

    Conversion

    Attention becoming pipeline

  5. 05

    Measurement

    What it is actually doing

What we learn in measurement rewrites the strategy ↶

What sits inside each layer

Strategy

Customer & market insight

Interviews with your customers, your founders, and your sales calls. The recurring sentences become the content themes, which is why the output does not read like everyone else in your category.

Customer calls12 interviews
Recurring themeHeard
“We rebuild the report every month”7×
“Finance won’t sign off without a source”5×
“We tried a tool, nobody adopted it”4×
Feeds the roadmap9 topics →

Strategy, the content engine, conversion and measurement run on every engagement. Distribution is the only layer where we choose – and we choose two or three, not all five.

Channel selection

We don't run twelve channels. We pick two or three.

Choosing is most of the job. Running every channel badly is what happens when nobody is allowed to say no, and it's the single most expensive habit in content marketing.

The right answer depends on where your buyers already are, how they decide, and what you can credibly say that nobody else can. Here's roughly how it tends to fall out.

  • B2B SaaS with a sales team

    SearchAI discoveryFounder social

    Long consideration cycles and a buyer who researches in public. Search and AI answers catch the ones already looking. The founder's account reaches the ones who aren't.

  • Developer tool

    CommunitySearchOriginal research

    Developers distrust marketing and trust each other. The work goes where they already argue, and the research earns the links marketing never would.

  • Founder-led startup, pre-team

    Founder socialNewsletterSearch

    You have no audience and no domain authority, but you do have a founder with a point of view. Social builds the list, the list compounds, search catches up.

  • Consumer or high-volume category

    SearchNewsletterProgrammatic

    Demand already exists and the decision is fast. The job is coverage at the moment of intent, then a reason to come back.

  • Enterprise software, long sales cycles

    Original researchSearchFounder social

    Six people have to agree, and most of them will never fill in a form. You need something a champion can forward internally, and a name the committee already recognises.

  • Agency or consultancy

    Founder socialNewsletterSearch

    People buy the person before they buy the firm. The founder's account is the product demo, and the list is where the referrals actually come from.

  • Regulated category: fintech, health, legal

    SearchAI discoveryNewsletter

    Everything gets reviewed before it ships, which rules out reactive social. Depth and accuracy are the advantage, and they happen to be exactly what search and AI answers reward.

  • Ecommerce or DTC brand

    SearchNewsletterCommunity

    Paid gets expensive and rented. Search catches the comparison searches, the list carries repeat purchase, and the community is where the brand actually gets defended.

Then we find out, instead of guessing.

AI didn't make content cheaper so much as it made experimentation cheaper. We can run four bets in the time a traditional retainer runs one, read the signals, and put the budget where something actually moved.

Bet ledger · first 90 days4 started · 2 kept
Search · buyer-intent articlesScaled
Founder social · 3 posts a weekScaled
Newsletter · biweeklyPaused
Community · 4 subredditsStopped

Month 1

Run all of them, properly. A half-run bet teaches you nothing.

Month 2

Read early signals. Not conversions yet, and I won't pretend otherwise.

Month 3

Kill the flat ones. Move their budget onto whatever moved.

Illustrative, not a forecast. Which bets you start with, and which ones survive, comes out of the diagnosis and then out of the data.

Leverage

One good idea should become eight assets.

Most content operations turn one idea into one article and call it a week. The expensive part was never the writing. It was getting the idea out of your head in the first place.

The source

45 minutes with your founder or a customer.

Recorded, transcribed, and mined for the sentences only your company could say. That transcript is the raw material for everything on the right.

Your time45 min
Everything elsemine
  1. POV article

    Content engine

    The long version, with the argument intact

  2. Founder posts

    Distribution

    Four of them, in your voice, for your approval

  3. Newsletter issue

    Distribution

    The same idea, to people who already asked

  4. Search page

    Distribution

    Rewritten around the question people type

  5. Community answer

    Distribution

    Where your buyers compare tools in public

  6. Lead magnet

    Conversion

    The part worth trading an email address for

  7. Sales asset

    Conversion

    The objection handled before the call

  8. AI-citable source

    Distribution

    Structured so assistants quote you, not a competitor

  9. The next question

    Strategy

    What the replies argued about becomes interview two

This is what the automation is actually for. Not writing the words – moving one idea across eight surfaces without eight people and eight handovers.

Pricing

Two ways in. Production is separate.

Start with a diagnosis or go straight to the retainer. Execution capacity bolts on underneath, priced apart from the leadership, so a team that already has writers never has to buy it.

Start here2-week sprint

Discovery

$2,500· one-off

Two weeks to work out what should actually happen. Customer and sales-call interviews, an audit of what you already have, a competitive read, the channel recommendation with reasoning, and a prioritised 90-day plan.

Yours to keep and hand to anyone, whether or not we carry on.

DiagnosisWeek 2 of 2
Week 1 · Listen✓ Complete
  • 6 customer calls
  • Content + channel audit
  • Competitive read · 8 brands
Week 2 · DecideIn progress
  • Channel recommendation
  • 90-day plan
  • Measurement framework
Yours either way90-day plan ↓
Most commonMonth to month

Fractional Head of Content

From $5,000/ month

I own the system. Strategy and positioning, which channels we bet on, editorial direction and the quality bar, founder and customer interviews, the conversion path, analytics, managing whoever is already producing, and quarterly planning.

Weekly working sessions. A monthly report you can take to a board. No annual lock-in.

The system · Month 3Running

Strategy

themes · positioning

Owned

Content engine

standard · briefs

Owned

Distribution

3 bets running

Owned

Conversion

capture · hand-off

Owned

Measurement

monthly report

Owned
AccountableOne person. Me.

Most people start with Discovery, then move onto the retainer with the plan already in hand. Book a 30-minute call →

Execution capacity

Production, if you don't already have it.

Two ways to buy it. Same brief, same standard, same editor at the end. What differs is what each is good at, and neither is good at everything.

Route A

AI agents and automations

$2,000a month, flat

The systems I have already built, pointed at your production line.

What to expect

  • A cadence that holds every week, rather than whenever someone has time
  • Drafts back the same day you brief them, and again after you change your mind
  • Everything published turned into posts, sends and answers without being chased

Strongest at

  • Volume, and holding a standard across all of it
  • Research, on-page SEO, internal linking, structured data, reporting
  • Repurposing one idea across every surface it belongs on

Not this

  • Posting in communities under your name
  • Pitching a journalist, a partner or a podcast
  • An opinion nobody has given it, or a story nobody has told it

Route B

People

From $2,000a month, scales with volume

Vetted writers, editors and designers I brief, manage and hold to the standard.

What to expect

  • Fewer pieces, further from the obvious answer
  • A week or two per piece, and it queues behind whatever else they have on
  • Someone who pushes back on the brief when the brief is wrong

Strongest at

  • Judgement, taste, and sounding like a person wrote it
  • First-hand work: interviews, customer stories, an argument nobody has made
  • Relationships that earn links, mentions and invitations

Not this

  • Cheap cadence. More output means more hours means more cost
  • Being available the moment you need something turned around
  • The repetitive work a system should be doing instead

Most engagements run both, because the lists above are close to opposites. Either way nothing publishes without my edit on it, and if you already have writers you need neither column.

Proof

Real numbers, not vibes.

Search is where most of these receipts come from, because it's where most of the work has been. Full case studies sent before the call – including what didn't work.

  • ColdIQ

    1,000pages in 60 days

    Automated directory built end-to-end with n8n + Claude. Indexed and ranking inside the quarter.

    Read a case study
    Index coverage · ColdIQ1,000+

    Indexed

    1,000

    +987

    Crawled

    1,043

    total

    Sprint

    60d

    days

    Day 1Day 60
  • Reply.io

    organic traffic

    Editorial + programmatic system. 45K monthly visits in 18 months. +37% conversions.

    Read a case study
    Organic traffic · Reply.io3× growth

    Before

    15K

    sessions/mo

    After

    45K

    +193% in 18mo

    Month 1Month 18
  • TextPie

    620%traffic growth

    Chrome Store traffic engine – content automation paired with technical SEO foundation.

    Traffic growth · TextPie+620%

    Articles

    87

    Avg position

    #14

    Month 1Month 12
Words

What founders and operators say.

Eighteen quotes, all real, all linkable – names, titles, and companies straight from busyless.space.

  • Eugene is insanely talented with automation and SEO. He helped us produce content at scale without sacrificing quality, which is rare. Couldn't think of a better person for speed and precision.

    Loïc Reco

    Loïc Reco

    Product · ColdIQ

  • Yevhen consistently delivered content on time, strictly adhering to briefs while frequently exceeding expectations. What sets Yevhen apart is balancing technical SEO with engaging, reader-friendly content.

    Konstantin Vashkevich

    Konstantin Vashkevich

    Head of Marketing · RedTrack.io

  • Working with Yevhen has been great. They think strategically about SEO, focus on what drives growth, and execute consistently. Clear communication, strong ownership, real results.

    Ivan Khymych

    Ivan Khymych

    CEO & Founder · SimplyDepo

  • Working with Yevhen is an absolute pleasure. His marketing analysis is some of the most in-depth I've ever seen. He consistently goes above and beyond expectations.

    Ira Nykytenko

    Ira Nykytenko

    Operations Manager · Awesomic

  • What truly sets Eugene apart is his deep understanding of SaaS content marketing. He knows how to make content work hard – pulling in the right audience and converting them.

    Andrew Kolp

    Andrew Kolp

    Founder · Generect

  • Eugene has been a huge help to us at TextPie.io as our Advisor. As a content and SEO expert, he helped us build a strong foundation for our SEO strategy.

    Vladyslav Sizov

    Vladyslav Sizov

    Founder · TextPie

  • Working with Yevhen was great. Super professional, really quick, and to the point. Didn't need to manage anything – Yevhen got it right away. Definitely a strong recommend.

    Max Bondarenko

    Max Bondarenko

    CMO · Spendbase

  • Eugene is one of those rare professionals who combines incredible skills with an unbeatable work ethic and amazing attitude. He creates experiences that grab attention and drive results.

    Rimma Sytnik

    Rimma Sytnik

    Head of Inbound Marketing · Reply

  • Eugene is the easiest person to work with. He jumps in, gets it, and delivers great content without hand-holding. His topic suggestions helped us jump into top 10 right away.

    Galyna Golitsyna

    Galyna Golitsyna

    Digital Marketing Team Lead · 42DM

  • Working with Eugene has been an absolute pleasure. As Head of Content, Eugene is not only a talented professional and a leader but also a supportive and empathetic colleague.

    Olivia Minko

    Olivia Minko

    Fractional CMO

  • Eugene helped with our marketing efforts at Strada and has been terrific to work with. He's professional, dependable, and always finds a way to deliver high-quality work.

    Amir Prodensky

    Amir Prodensky

    CEO · Strada

  • Working with Eugene has been a breeze. Sharp thinking, receptive to feedback, and always on time. One of those collaborators who gets it. Highly recommend.

    Jean-Philippe Timog Métivier

    Jean-Philippe Timog Métivier

    SEO, Content & Brand · Tervene

  • His contributions have been incredibly valuable to our blog. I have immense confidence in his knowledge and expertise. He is undoubtedly a professional in content.

    Zeynep Kantav

    Zeynep Kantav

    Marketing Manager · Transkriptor

  • Eugene's proactive approach ensured that we stayed ahead of the curve, implementing the latest SEO strategies and best practices. His expertise is evident.

    Alessio Mavika

    Alessio Mavika

    Founder · AgencyDots

  • Eugene's commitment to quality and professionalism is truly impressive. He consistently offers fresh ideas, showcases great writing skills, and is always open to discussion.

    Svitlana Fomenko

    Svitlana Fomenko

    Marketing Manager · CloudTalk

  • Eugene is a rare find with his mix of creativity and data-driven thinking. He knows how to create engaging content that grabs attention and drives traffic.

    Maksym Zubenko

    Maksym Zubenko

    Head of Organic Growth · Jooble

  • Eugene's expertise didn't stop at content creation; he also offered valuable insights that boosted my website's performance and set the stage for better lead generation.

    Dmytro Chervonyi

    Dmytro Chervonyi

    Co-founder · Forecastio

  • From his exceptional marketing skills to his expert content creation abilities, Eugene consistently excels. It was a pleasure to collaborate with someone so professional and talented.

    Daniel Sokolov

    Daniel Sokolov

    Marketing Manager · PPM Express

How this is different

Ownership, without the headcount.

An agency owns the channel it sells. A freelancer owns a slice. A full-time head owns all of it, in three to six months, at roughly three times the cost. This is the fourth option.

busyless
Content agency
Full-time hire
Freelancers
Owns the whole content system
Yes
Owns their scope
Yes
No
Decides which channels to bet on
Yes
Sells their channel
Yes
No
Customer interviews feed the content
Yes
Rarely
Yes
No
Production capacity included
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Search and AI discovery covered
Yes
Separate retainer
Depends on the hire
One slice
Conversion path and reporting owned
Yes
Add-on
Yes
No
Time to first content live
14 days
6–10 weeks
3–6 months to hire
3–4 weeks
Scales down when you don't need it
Yes
Contract term
No
Yes
You own everything produced
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Monthly cost
$5k–$11k
$5k–$15k
$14.5k–$18k loaded
$2k–$8k

Full-time cost is the mid to senior median for the role, loaded at 1.32 for payroll and benefits. Same figures as the Head of Content salary data on this site. Agency and freelance ranges are typical market rates, not quotes.

What you're buying is judgement, not keyboard hours.

At this price my own typing is the least valuable thing on offer. The work that moves a number is deciding what to do and refusing to do the rest. Everything else has been built to run without me.

I own this

The judgement

  • Diagnosing what is actually wrong
  • Choosing the channels, and killing the ones that flatline
  • Positioning, narrative, and the claims we are allowed to make
  • Interviewing your founders and your customers
  • The editorial standard, and what does not ship
  • Reading performance and changing direction on it
  • Managing whoever is already producing

My team and infrastructure run this

The throughput

  • Research and competitive monitoring
  • Briefs and first drafts
  • Editing support and design
  • Publishing, internal linking, and structured data
  • Repurposing into posts, sends, and answers
  • Reporting and data collection

Every piece still passes a human edit and a brand-voice check before it ships. Automation handles the plumbing, never the call.

Already have a team, and just need someone to point it?

Then you want the left column only. Say so on the call and we skip the production conversation entirely.

Talk to me
How it works

From nobody owning it to a system that compounds.

Diagnosis in the first two weeks. Everything live by week four. The first honest read on what's working by month three.

  1. Step 01 · Days 1–7

    Diagnose

    What already works, what your customers actually say, where the demand is, and what the competition has and hasn't claimed. Sales calls and customer conversations included, because that's where the content comes from. You get the gap map whether we continue or not.

    System audit4 gaps
    Search
    30%
    47 missed
    Social
    15%
    no cadence
    Owned
    20%
    no list
    Convert
    35%
    no path
    6 customer calls · 8 brands scannedReport ready
  2. Step 02 · Days 8–14

    Decide

    The 90-day plan: the two or three channels worth betting on and why, the content themes, the conversion path, and the measurement framework we'll be judged against. Approved before a single thing ships.

    90-day plan · 3 betsApproved
    W1
    W2
    W3
    W4
    Search8 articles + 30 pSEO
    Founder3 posts a week
    Newsletterbiweekly, list build
    Deliverable: 90-day roadmap · channel playbooks · brief templates
  3. Step 03 · Weeks 3–4

    Activate

    First content live and the production system wired up – briefs, drafting, editing, publishing, repurposing, and reporting running on rails. The bets are all live at once, deliberately, so month two has something to read.

    Queue · Wk 13/4 live
    LivePOV article · from the founder interview2,400 words
    LiveFounder posts · cut from the same interview4 drafts
    LivePublish pipeline · brief → draft → liveauto
    ScheduledNewsletter #1 · capture path wiredWk 4
  4. Step 04 · Month 2+

    Run

    Weekly working sessions and a monthly report split into leading and business indicators. Quarterly we kill what didn't move and concentrate the budget on what did. That loop is the job.

    Monthly report · Month 3Compounding

    Leading

    Branded search

    reach · list growth

    Business

    Qualified signups

    pipeline influenced

    Decision

    Concentrate

    2 bets kept

Every engagement follows this ramp – then I run the system on an ongoing basis with no fixed end date.

Let's build

One call. Real plan, not a pitch.

30 minutes. We talk about what's already working, who owns content today, and whether a fractional Head of Content is actually the right move. If it isn't, I'll say so.

Direct calendar

Book a 30-min intro call

Loading scheduler…

Calendar busy?

Send a note instead.

One sentence on the bottleneck. I'll reply within 24h with a sharper next step.

Or send a note

FAQ

Questions, ahead of time.

  • What does a fractional Head of Content actually do?+
    The same job the full-time version does, on a fraction of the week. I decide what we say and to whom, pick the two or three channels worth investing in, set the editorial standard, run the founder and customer interviews the content comes out of, own the conversion path, and read the numbers well enough to change direction. The difference is that you get the judgement without carrying the salary.
  • Which channels do you run?+
    Whichever two or three are most likely to work for you. Search, AI discovery, founder-led social, newsletter, community, original research. Choosing is part of the job, so I will not answer that before the diagnosis. What runs regardless of channel is the rest of the system: strategy, production, conversion, and measurement.
  • How is this different from an agency?+
    An agency is measured on the channel it sells, so the gaps between channels stay yours. I am measured on whether the content system creates demand, which means I will tell you to stop doing something I could have billed you for. One operator owns strategy and execution, so nothing is lost in a hand-off to juniors you never meet.
  • How is it different from hiring someone full-time?+
    A Head of Content is a six-figure salary plus payroll loading plus three to six months to find and onboard, and on day one they still have no writers, no production system, and no analytics. I start inside two weeks, and the team and infrastructure arrive with me. When you are ready for the full-time hire, you will hand them a system that already runs.
  • Do you do the work, or just tell us what to do?+
    Both, and they are priced separately. The leadership retainer buys judgement: strategy, channel calls, editorial direction, interviews, quality control, and interpretation. Execution capacity is an add-on for production, so you can buy judgement without buying volume if you already have a team.
  • Is the content AI-generated?+
    AI is infrastructure, not the product. It handles research, first drafts, repurposing, internal linking, publishing, and reporting. Every piece still runs through a brief built from real customer input, a human edit, and a brand-voice check before it ships. What AI actually buys you is cheaper experimentation: we can test four bets in a month instead of one.
  • What do you actually report on?+
    Two sets of numbers. Leading indicators tell us whether the system is working: search and AI visibility, branded search, social reach, newsletter growth, returning visitors, target accounts engaging. Business indicators tell us whether it matters: qualified signups, demo requests, content-assisted opportunities, pipeline influenced. Attribution is never perfectly clean and I will not pretend otherwise. The job is to show the contribution honestly, not to claim every touch.
  • How do Discovery, leadership and execution fit together?+
    Discovery is a one-off two-week diagnosis and a 90-day plan you keep, whether or not we carry on. The leadership retainer is month-to-month with no annual lock-in. Execution capacity is added or removed as you need it. Most people start with Discovery, then move to the retainer with the plan already in hand. The first 90 days is where compounding starts to show, so give it that long before calling it.